AX-2026-042307 · 5-Amino-1MQ · TFC lot TFC-2508-L2057

Section 1

Results

Measured against the index acceptance specification for the non-peptide adjuncts class. A specification is a decision the index made; a result is a measurement. See where each threshold came from.

Parameter	Method	Result	Unit	Index spec
Purity	RP-HPLC, 30 min gradient, 214 nm	99.90	% area	≥ 98.0	PASS
Total impurities	RP-HPLC, sum of reported peaks	0.10	% area	≤ 2.0	PASS
Largest single impurity	RP-HPLC — 8-amino regioisomer	0.07	% area	≤ 1.00	PASS
Identity	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	required for VERIFIED status	NOT TESTED
Peptide content	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	required to check label claim	NOT TESTED
Water content	Karl Fischer, coulometric, duplicate	5.79	%	≤ 10.0	PASS
Counter-ion (iodide)	anion-exchange ion chromatography	46.57	%	≤ 12.0	FAIL
Residual solvent + inorganic residue	estimated — see /methods/residual-solvents-q3c/	0.36	%	—	NOT TESTED
Endotoxin	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	≤ 5.0	NOT TESTED
Sterility	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	no growth	NOT TESTED
Appearance	visual, diffuse light, black and white background	White lyophilised cake, intact	—	white to off-white intact cake	PASS
Reconstitution clarity	reconstituted per submitter procedure	Clear, colourless, no visible particulates	—	clear, no visible particulates	PASS
pH (reconstituted, 1 mg/mL)	potentiometric, two-point calibration	5.93	—	2.5 – 8.0	PASS
Retention time (observed)	RP-HPLC, 30 min gradient	5.35	min	5.42 ± 0.25 (normalised)	PASS
Peak asymmetry (10 % height)	Ph. Eur. 2.2.46	1.08	—	0.80 – 1.50	PASS
Plate count, main peak	N = 5.54 (t/w½)²	51,631	—	≥ 20,000	PASS
Resolution to nearest impurity	vs 8-amino regioisomer	2.28	—	no index criterion	REPORTED

Section 2

Chromatogram and peak integration

The figure is drawn from the table. It is not an independent illustration — if a number in the table changed, the trace would change with it.

Figure 1. RP-HPLC trace, 30 min gradient, 214 nm. Drawn from the peak-integration table below: peak positions are the reported retention times, peak areas are the reported area percentages, peak widths follow the reported plate count of 51,631, and skew follows the reported asymmetry factor of 1.08. Baseline noise is seeded from the report ID and is illustrative. The lower panel is the same trace at a stated vertical expansion with the slow gradient drift subtracted, because at full scale a 0.07 % impurity against a 99.90 % main peak is a line two pixels tall; the main peak runs off-scale there by design.

#	Peak	RT	Area (µV·s)	% area	Δ mass (Da)
1	5-Amino-1MQ — main peak	5.35	4,855,450	99.90	—
2	8-amino regioisomer	5.57	3,402	0.07	0.000
3	1-methylquinolinium (des-amino, −15 Da)	5.03	972	0.02	-15.011
4	5-nitro-1MQ (unreduced precursor, +30 Da)	6.03	486	0.01	+29.974
Closure check — purity + Σ impurities				100.00	CLOSES

Reporting threshold 0.05 % area. Peaks below it are not reported and are therefore excluded from the total, which overstates purity by their sum — see peak integration.

Section 4

Gravimetric mass balance

Water, counter-ion, residual and total peptide content are exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. They must account for 100 % of the cake mass. The index closes this to within 0.02 pp and the build asserts it.

Supplier certificate, as declared

The supplier's own figures for this lot, beside the independent measurement. Divergence is assessed against the batch median, not against this single report — see rule AX-R05.

Figure	Supplier COA	This report	Index note
Purity (% area)	99.5	99.90	divergence -0.25 pp vs batch median
Total impurities (% area)	0.50	0.10
Largest single impurity (% area)	0.34	0.07
Water (%)	not stated	5.79
Counter-ion (%)	not stated	46.57
Peptide content (%w/w)	91.7	not determined
Endotoxin (EU/mg)	1.42	not determined
Method stated on certificate	YES	—	column, gradient and wavelength given

Section 5

Provenance and caveats

Where a sample came from changes the weight of the evidence. The index treats it as a first-class field.

Sample provenance: Buyer-sourced
Evidentiary weight: Strongest available evidence in this index.
Chain of custody: Domestic warehouse despatch → submitter (2–8 °C, 23 d) → laboratory (courier, cold pack, 8 d) → assay.
Assay date: 16 Mar 2026
Submitted to the index: 21 Mar 2026
Laboratory: Janoshik Analytical, Ostrava, Czechia
Method basis: 30 min gradient · high-resolution MS
Verification status: PURITY ONLY

What this report does not establish

That the compound is the compound named. No identity confirmation was ordered on this submission. A purity figure describes chromatographic homogeneity of whatever eluted; it does not name it.
How much of the named compound is in the vial. Peptide content was not determined, so recovered mass cannot be calculated and the label claim cannot be checked.
That the material is free of bacterial endotoxin. Endotoxin was not measured. No chromatographic result bears on it.
That the material is sterile. Sterility was not tested.
That any other vial in the same lot has the same composition. One vial was tested. Within-lot vial-to-vial variation in this index has a median of 0.28 pp and a 90th percentile of 0.74 pp.
That any other lot from the same supplier has the same composition. Batch-to-batch variation is larger than within-batch variation for every supplier here.
That the material is suitable for administration to a human or an animal. These are research compounds. No result on this site is a safety assessment and the index takes no position on use.
That the material was manufactured by the supplier that sold it. Contract synthesis is normal in this market and twenty-nine batches in the index fingerprint to a bulk from a different company than the one named on the label.

Section 6

Annotations 5

Signed technical comments from index contributors. Not a discussion forum — annotations question or contextualise the result, and the data team replies where a reply is warranted.

coa_template21 Mar 2026

Certificate templates are fingerprints. A template that rounds every purity to the nearest half is a document-generation choice made once and applied to every lot, and it says nothing about any individual one.

spec_vs_result21 Mar 2026

A specification is a decision and a result is a measurement. Where a template puts one in the other's field the fix is editorial, and the numbers behind it reconcile fine — 99.90 % here against the declared figure.

iso_audit21 Mar 2026

Under a quality system a result field and a specification field are different controlled fields, and conflating them is a document-control observation. It is also one of the easiest things in this whole market to fix.

coa_reader21 Mar 2026

The index publishes the declared figure and the measured figure side by side and does not adjudicate between them. Both are on this page and the difference is stated rather than characterised.

median_not_mean21 Mar 2026

Clear enough as written.

Section 7

Related records

Same batch — lot TFC-2508-L2057 n=5

Report	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-042305	TFC-2508-L2057	Janoshik	2026-Q1	99.51	4.99	104.9	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL
AX-2026-042306	TFC-2508-L2057	Medutest	2026-Q1	99.75	5.49	—	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL
AX-2026-042308	TFC-2508-L2057	PeptideMeter	2026-Q1	99.77	5.28	89.4	Buyer-sourced	2	FAIL
AX-2026-042309	TFC-2508-L2057	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q1	99.37	5.04	—	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL

Batch rollup and reproducibility assessment →

Cross-sections

Other recent 5-Amino-1MQ records in the index.
Report	Supplier	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-043050	KP	KP-2511-W5347	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.35	4.16	105.5	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-043044	KP	KP-2511-W5347	PeptideMeter	2026-Q2	99.61	4.15	90.9	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-043052	KP	KP-2511-W5347	Medutest	2026-Q2	99.45	4.23	105.5	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL
AX-2026-043045	KP	KP-2511-W5347	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.47	4.08	—	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-043043	KP	KP-2511-W5347	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.58	4.16	101.1	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-042869	GGPeps	GGPE-2512-M2434	Kestrel	2026-Q2	99.55	4.65	103.9	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-042868	GGPeps	GGPE-2512-M2434	PeptideMeter	2026-Q2	99.32	4.39	88.5	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL
AX-2026-043047	KP	KP-2511-W5347	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.68	4.17	104.0	Supplier-supplied	0	FAIL

Other recent TFC records in the index.
Report	Compound	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-042265	Humanin (HNG)	TFC-2605-U1300	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	99.52	6.31	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042222	SS-31 (Elamipretide)	TFC-2607-R9099	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q3	99.46	5.41	102.6	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042236	Humanin (HNG)	TFC-2608-S9940	Nordanalyt	2026-Q3	98.64	1.80	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042282	Retatrutide	TFC-2608-J1156	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.54	4.27	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042226	SS-31 (Elamipretide)	TFC-2607-R9099	Janoshik	2026-Q3	99.62	5.47	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042217	Semaglutide	TFC-2604-X9037	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	98.95	4.61	96.9	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042339	Sermorelin	TFC-2605-Y2176	Kestrel	2026-Q3	99.93	4.14	—	Supplier-supplied	1	FAIL
AX-2026-042214	Semaglutide	TFC-2604-X9037	Kestrel	2026-Q3	99.87	4.66	103.1	Laboratory-retained	0	PASS