AssayIndex
Cross-section

MOTS-c by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for MOTS-c, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

105 recordsmedian 99.13 %spec 98.0 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik4730minHigh99.28+0.0099.28ADEQUATE
Medutest1625minUnit99.06+0.0898.98ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter1528minHigh99.13-0.0599.18ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate1332minHigh98.58-0.1198.69ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt835minHigh99.13+0.0299.11ADEQUATE
Kestrel6 n=615minUnit99.22+0.2498.98ADEQUATE
96.997.498.098.599.199.6100.2JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 98.48, median 99.28, Q3 99.71, n=47n=47PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.20, median 99.13, Q3 99.66, n=15n=15MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.78, median 99.06, Q3 99.48, n=16n=16VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 98.04, median 98.58, Q3 99.55, n=13n=13NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 98.61, median 99.13, Q3 99.49, n=8n=8KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.55, median 99.22, Q3 99.70, n=6n=6 Purity (% area)
Figure. MOTS-c purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.