AssayIndex
Cross-section

Ipamorelin by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for Ipamorelin, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

204 recordsmedian 99.47 %spec 99.0 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik8730minHigh99.50+0.0099.50ADEQUATE
Medutest3625minUnit99.38+0.0899.30ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter3228minHigh99.44-0.0599.48ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate1732minHigh99.22-0.1199.33ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt1635minHigh99.59+0.0299.57ADEQUATE
Kestrel1615minUnit99.47+0.2499.23ADEQUATE
97.798.198.598.999.399.7100.1JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 99.12, median 99.50, Q3 99.79, n=87outlier 97.95outlier 98.10n=87PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.84, median 99.44, Q3 99.83, n=32n=32MedutestMedutest: Q1 99.12, median 99.38, Q3 99.72, n=36outlier 98.05outlier 98.07outlier 98.15n=36VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 98.98, median 99.22, Q3 99.58, n=17outlier 97.86n=17NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 99.22, median 99.59, Q3 99.74, n=16n=16KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.99, median 99.47, Q3 99.93, n=16n=16 Purity (% area)
Figure. Ipamorelin purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.