AssayIndex
Cross-section

CJC-1295 with DAC by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for CJC-1295 with DAC, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

121 recordsmedian 98.95 %spec 97.5 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik6030minHigh98.98+0.0098.98ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter2128minHigh98.87-0.0598.92ADEQUATE
Medutest1725minUnit99.09+0.0899.01ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt1035minHigh98.94+0.0298.92ADEQUATE
Kestrel815minUnit99.11+0.2498.87ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate5 n=532minHigh98.39-0.1198.50ADEQUATE
96.697.297.898.499.099.6100.2JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 98.41, median 98.98, Q3 99.28, n=60outlier 96.83outlier 96.99n=60PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.49, median 98.87, Q3 99.10, n=21n=21MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.68, median 99.09, Q3 99.65, n=17n=17VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 98.28, median 98.39, Q3 98.44, n=5outlier 97.62outlier 99.00n=5NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 98.51, median 98.94, Q3 99.23, n=10n=10KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.68, median 99.11, Q3 99.66, n=8outlier 97.16n=8 Purity (% area)
Figure. CJC-1295 with DAC purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.