AX-2024-004395 · NAD+ · TFS lot TFS-{CAT}-1523

Section 1

Results

Measured against the index acceptance specification for the non-peptide adjuncts class. A specification is a decision the index made; a result is a measurement. See where each threshold came from.

Parameter	Method	Result	Unit	Index spec
Purity	RP-HPLC, 25 min gradient, 214 nm	99.72	% area	≥ 97.0	PASS
Total impurities	RP-HPLC, sum of reported peaks	0.28	% area	≤ 3.0	PASS
Largest single impurity	RP-HPLC — ADP-ribose (−121 Da)	0.11	% area	≤ 1.00	PASS
Identity — theoretical monoisotopic mass	calculated from molecular formula	663.1091	Da	—	NOT TESTED
Identity — observed monoisotopic mass	LC-MS, unit resolution (single quadrupole)	663.1152	Da	—	NOT TESTED
Mass accuracy	observed vs theoretical	+9.2	ppm	± 10	PASS
Peptide content	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	required to check label claim	NOT TESTED
Water content	Karl Fischer, coulometric, duplicate	10.05	%	≤ 10.0	FAIL
Counter-ion	no ionisable counter-ion expected	N/A	—	not applicable	NOT TESTED
Residual solvent + inorganic residue	estimated — see /methods/residual-solvents-q3c/	0.99	%	—	NOT TESTED
Endotoxin	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	≤ 5.0	NOT TESTED
Sterility	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	no growth	NOT TESTED
Appearance	visual, diffuse light, black and white background	White lyophilised cake, intact	—	white to off-white intact cake	PASS
Reconstitution clarity	reconstituted per submitter procedure	Clear, colourless, no visible particulates	—	clear, no visible particulates	PASS
pH (reconstituted, 1 mg/mL)	potentiometric, two-point calibration	6.44	—	2.5 – 8.0	PASS
Retention time (observed)	RP-HPLC, 25 min gradient	3.44	min	3.52 ± 0.25 (normalised)	PASS
Peak asymmetry (10 % height)	Ph. Eur. 2.2.46	1.10	—	0.80 – 1.50	PASS
Plate count, main peak	N = 5.54 (t/w½)²	71,239	—	≥ 20,000	PASS
Resolution to nearest impurity	vs ADP-ribose (−121 Da)	4.10	—	no index criterion	REPORTED

Section 2

Chromatogram and peak integration

The figure is drawn from the table. It is not an independent illustration — if a number in the table changed, the trace would change with it.

Figure 1. RP-HPLC trace, 25 min gradient, 214 nm. Drawn from the peak-integration table below: peak positions are the reported retention times, peak areas are the reported area percentages, peak widths follow the reported plate count of 71,239, and skew follows the reported asymmetry factor of 1.10. Baseline noise is seeded from the report ID and is illustrative. The lower panel is the same trace at a stated vertical expansion with the slow gradient drift subtracted, because at full scale a 0.11 % impurity against a 99.72 % main peak is a line two pixels tall; the main peak runs off-scale there by design.

#	Peak	RT	Area (µV·s)	% area	Δ mass (Da)
1	NAD+ — main peak	3.44	4,846,701	99.72	—
2	ADP-ribose (−121 Da)	3.22	5,346	0.11	-121.040
3	nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN, −331 Da)	3.09	4,374	0.09	-331.058
4	NADH (reduced, +2 Da)	3.72	1,944	0.04	+2.016
5	nicotinamide (−541 Da)	2.87	1,944	0.04	-541.052
Closure check — purity + Σ impurities				100.00	CLOSES

Reporting threshold 0.05 % area. Peaks below it are not reported and are therefore excluded from the total, which overstates purity by their sum — see peak integration.

Section 3

Mass spectrum and identity

Theoretical monoisotopic mass 663.1091 Da, computed from C21H27N7O14P2. All ppm figures on this site are against monoisotopic values — see why that matters.

Figure 2. ESI charge-state envelope, unit-resolution instrument. Sticks are placed at m/z = (M + z × 1.007276)/z for the observed neutral mass of 663.1152 Da. Sodium (+21.982/z) and potassium (+37.956/z) adducts are shown where the parent charge state exceeds 25 % relative abundance; they are adducts of the same molecule and are not impurities.

Charge	Theoretical m/z	Observed m/z	Δ m/z	Rel. abundance (%)
2+	332.5618	332.5649	0.0031	55.5
1+	664.1164	664.1225	0.0061	100.0

Section 4

Gravimetric mass balance

Water, counter-ion, residual and total peptide content are exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. They must account for 100 % of the cake mass. The index closes this to within 0.02 pp and the build asserts it.

Supplier certificate, as declared

The supplier's own figures for this lot, beside the independent measurement. Divergence is assessed against the batch median, not against this single report — see rule AX-R05.

Figure	Supplier COA	This report	Index note
Purity (% area)	99.81	99.72	divergence +0.09 pp vs batch median
Total impurities (% area)	0.19	0.28
Largest single impurity (% area)	0.10	0.11
Water (%)	8.0	10.05
Counter-ion (%)	7.0	N/A
Peptide content (%w/w)	84.4	not determined
Endotoxin (EU/mg)	0.68	not determined
Method stated on certificate	YES	—	column, gradient and wavelength given

Section 5

Provenance and caveats

Where a sample came from changes the weight of the evidence. The index treats it as a first-class field.

Sample provenance: Buyer-sourced
Evidentiary weight: Strongest available evidence in this index.
Chain of custody: Retail purchase → submitter (−20 °C, 26 d) → laboratory (courier, dry ice, 4 d) → assay.
Assay date: 12 May 2024
Submitted to the index: 18 May 2024
Laboratory: Medutest, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Method basis: 25 min gradient · unit-resolution MS
Verification status: IDENTITY CONSISTENT

What this report does not establish

That the compound is not a near-isobaric alternative. Identity was confirmed at unit mass resolution, which cannot exclude species differing by 1 or 2 Da. The specific alternatives not excluded are named in the identity block above.
How much of the named compound is in the vial. Peptide content was not determined, so recovered mass cannot be calculated and the label claim cannot be checked.
That the material is free of bacterial endotoxin. Endotoxin was not measured. No chromatographic result bears on it.
That the material is sterile. Sterility was not tested.
That any other vial in the same lot has the same composition. One vial was tested. Within-lot vial-to-vial variation in this index has a median of 0.28 pp and a 90th percentile of 0.74 pp.
That any other lot from the same supplier has the same composition. Batch-to-batch variation is larger than within-batch variation for every supplier here.
That the material is suitable for administration to a human or an animal. These are research compounds. No result on this site is a safety assessment and the index takes no position on use.
That the material was manufactured by the supplier that sold it. Contract synthesis is normal in this market and twenty-nine batches in the index fingerprint to a bulk from a different company than the one named on the label.

Section 6

Annotations 3

Signed technical comments from index contributors. Not a discussion forum — annotations question or contextualise the result, and the data team replies where a reply is warranted.

wide_iqr18 May 2024

A single result at 99.72 % is one draw. What makes a supplier's process legible is the spread across its lots, and that is on the scorecard rather than here. This record is one good point in a distribution worth reading whole.

sample_vs_retail18 May 2024

Purity 99.72 %, water 10.05 %, counter-ion 0.00 % counter-ion, mass balance closed, provenance independent. There is nothing outstanding on this record.

kf_titrand18 May 2024

A duplicate titration on a second aliquot would establish whether 10.05 % is stable or still coming off. Karl Fischer is fast and the duplicate costs almost nothing.

Section 7

Related records

Same batch — lot TFS-{CAT}-1523 n=1

This is the only report on this lot. One report is not a batch characterisation.

Batch rollup and reproducibility assessment →

Cross-sections

Other recent NAD+ records in the index.
Report	Supplier	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-041208	WWB	WWB-2601-V1583	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q2	99.47	11.38	100.9	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-041209	WWB	WWB-2601-V1583	Nordanalyt	2026-Q2	99.47	11.40	106.7	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-041210	WWB	WWB-2601-V1583	Nordanalyt	2026-Q2	99.66	11.01	91.9	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-041211	WWB	WWB-2601-V1583	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.72	10.94	93.5	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-041213	WWB	WWB-2601-V1583	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q2	99.33	11.41	—	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2026-041212	WWB	WWB-2601-V1583	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.93	10.36	88.5	Laboratory-retained	1	FAIL
AX-2025-019628	TFC	TFC-2505-C1792	Janoshik	2025-Q3	99.72	11.19	92.6	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL
AX-2025-019134	GSP	GSP-2507-A3926	Janoshik	2025-Q3	98.84	11.68	—	Buyer-sourced	0	FAIL

Other recent TFS records in the index.
Report	Compound	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-041681	CJC-1295 with DAC	TFS-{CAT}-9675	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	98.82	3.67	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041766	BPC-157	TFS-{CAT}-1156	Janoshik	2026-Q3	99.54	6.34	—	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-041682	CJC-1295 with DAC	TFS-{CAT}-9675	Nordanalyt	2026-Q3	98.94	3.24	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041683	CJC-1295 with DAC	TFS-{CAT}-9675	Medutest	2026-Q3	98.68	3.46	97.0	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041765	BPC-157	TFS-{CAT}-1156	Janoshik	2026-Q3	99.79	6.01	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041680	CJC-1295 with DAC	TFS-{CAT}-9675	Medutest	2026-Q3	99.18	2.85	100.4	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041691	Semaglutide	TFS-{CAT}-9744	Janoshik	2026-Q2	98.31	6.07	91.4	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041700	SS-31 (Elamipretide)	TFS-{CAT}-1142	Medutest	2026-Q2	99.75	2.27	96.3	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS