AssayIndex
Cross-section

GHK-Cu by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for GHK-Cu, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

72 recordsmedian 98.56 %spec 97.0 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik2830minHigh98.53+0.0098.53ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter1728minHigh98.48-0.0598.53ADEQUATE
Medutest1025minUnit98.63+0.0898.55ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate6 n=632minHigh98.56-0.1198.67ADEQUATE
Kestrel6 n=615minUnit98.73+0.2498.49ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt5 n=535minHigh98.65+0.0298.63ADEQUATE
96.897.397.998.498.999.5100.0JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 98.34, median 98.53, Q3 98.89, n=28outlier 97.01outlier 99.73n=28PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.16, median 98.48, Q3 99.07, n=17n=17MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.22, median 98.63, Q3 99.18, n=10n=10VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 98.08, median 98.56, Q3 99.04, n=6n=6NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 98.59, median 98.65, Q3 98.65, n=5outlier 97.34outlier 98.88n=5KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.33, median 98.73, Q3 99.36, n=6n=6 Purity (% area)
Figure. GHK-Cu purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.