AssayIndex
Cross-section

Afamelanotide impurity profile

Every named species the index has reported alongside Afamelanotide, how often, at what level, and what its presence implies about the synthesis or the handling. Reporting threshold is 0.05 % area; anything below it is invisible to this page and is silently added to the main peak.

43 recordsmedian 99.06 %spec 98.0 %
Median total impurities 0.94% n=43
Median largest single 0.35% n=43
Worst single observed 1.42% n=43
Named species observed 4 / 4 n=4
Named speciesΔRT (min)Δ mass (Da)Seen inMedian % areaMax % area
Met sulfoxide (+16 Da)-0.44+15.995100%0.271.19
des-acetyl (−42 Da)-0.52-42.011100%0.210.87
native α-MSH (−32 Da)-0.66-32.03798%0.150.36
oxidised Trp (+16 Da)-0.38+15.99598%0.211.42

Met sulfoxide (+16 Da)

Retention offset from the main peak
-0.44 min on RG-2
Mass difference
+15.995 Da
Reported in
43 of 43 records (100 %)
Level when reported
median 0.27 %, max 1.19 %
How it separates
Baseline-resolved on the reference method.

des-acetyl (−42 Da)

Retention offset from the main peak
-0.52 min on RG-2
Mass difference
-42.011 Da
Reported in
43 of 43 records (100 %)
Level when reported
median 0.21 %, max 0.87 %
How it separates
Baseline-resolved on the reference method.

native α-MSH (−32 Da)

Retention offset from the main peak
-0.66 min on RG-2
Mass difference
-32.037 Da
Reported in
42 of 43 records (98 %)
Level when reported
median 0.15 %, max 0.36 %
How it separates
Baseline-resolved on the reference method.

oxidised Trp (+16 Da)

Retention offset from the main peak
-0.38 min on RG-2
Mass difference
+15.995 Da
Reported in
42 of 43 records (98 %)
Level when reported
median 0.21 %, max 1.42 %
How it separates
Baseline-resolved on the reference method.

Degradation pathways

Degradants are a handling finding rather than a synthesis finding. A lot that shipped clean and arrived oxidised tells you about the courier, not the chemist.

  • Met4 oxidation
  • acetyl loss