The more useful question than the rounding is whether the certificate states the method. Where it does, a rounded figure is comparable; where it does not, an unrounded one still is not.
method_absent
Certificates with a result and no method. Most of them.
Section 1
Contribution
Comments technically on records submitted by others. Annotations are signed and are not moderated for agreement.
Records submitted
0
n=0
Annotations
56
n=56
Median purity submitted
suppressed
n=0
n<3 — see individual records
Suppliers covered
0
n=0
This handle has submitted no records. Annotators comment on other people's submissions and are not required to submit.
Section 2
Annotations
Signed technical comments on records. The index does not moderate annotations for agreement with its own arithmetic, and several of these disagree with it. Where a handle has made the same point on several records, one instance is shown and the rest are reachable from the records themselves.
The gradient is on this record, which is the only reason any of this can be said. Most certificates in this market do not state one at all.
A resolution figure without a stated column and gradient is uninterpretable. Both are on this record, which is why the figure is worth printing at all.
The certificate for CPC-2501-V2021 states neither a method nor a basis. For a defined peptide that is a documentation gap; here it means the number cannot even be interpreted as a claim.
Showing 4 distinct comments of 56 annotations by this handle.