At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.78 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
lambda_214
Detection wavelength and the amide-bond absorbance argument.
Section 1
Contribution
Comments technically on records submitted by others. Annotations are signed and are not moderated for agreement.
Records submitted
0
n=0
Annotations
197
n=197
Median purity submitted
suppressed
n=0
n<3 — see individual records
Suppliers covered
0
n=0
This handle has submitted no records. Annotators comment on other people's submissions and are not required to submit.
Section 2
Annotations
Signed technical comments on records. The index does not moderate annotations for agreement with its own arithmetic, and several of these disagree with it. Where a handle has made the same point on several records, one instance is shown and the rest are reachable from the records themselves.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.58 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
Detection wavelength does not affect a mass determination but it does affect the purity figure sitting next to it. Both are stated on this record, which is the point.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.74 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.77 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.60 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.90 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.49 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.79 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.34 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.81 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
At 214 nm the amide bond dominates the response, so a peptide impurity is seen roughly in proportion to its size. 99.93 % on this detection is the conservative reading; a 280 nm trace would flatter it.
Showing 12 distinct comments of 197 annotations by this handle.